Many businesses rely on transport providers but do not have structured monitoring or documented oversight in place.
Policies exist — but audit trails, training records and monitoring frameworks are not consistently embedded.
Operational responsibility may be delegated, but legal accountability remains with the business.

Freight Owners
Retailers
Manufacturers
Resource Companies
Meet CoR obligations even when transport is outsourced, through practical controls, governance and defensible evidence.
Warehousing
Transport Providers
Build consistent assurance across sites, customers and subcontractor networks, without slowing operations.
Build consistent assurance across sites, customers, and subcontractor networks, without slowing operations.
Owner Drivers
Subcontractors
Fleet Managers
Put achievable controls and records in place that scale with growth and customer expectations.
Put achievable controls and records in place that scale with growth and customer expectations.
Fast baseline with a risk‑rated gap analysis and prioritised action plan.
.
Evidence‑based assurance through interviews, walkthroughs and record sampling.
Governance, controls, and documentation aligned to how your operation actually works.
Ongoing oversight, reporting cadence and action tracking to keep systems current and evidence healthy.
Structured triage, evidence packs and corrective action programs when scrutiny escalates.
Independent module audits and corrective action planning to support accreditation and ongoing compliance.
...
.
We define your role in the chain, sites/functions in scope, risk profile, and reporting expectations.
We request and review relevant documentation, records and operational context to focus effort where it matters.
We complete interviews, walkthroughs and evidence sampling aligned to the agreed plan.
You receive clear findings, priorities, recommended controls and a corrective action pathway with ownership and timeframes.

We confirm practical next steps, whether implementation support, verification, or ongoing oversight is required.
We help organisations strengthen heavy vehicle compliance through practical controls, clear governance, and reliable evidence. The focus is to support safer operations, reduce exposure to enforcement action, and help your business demonstrate due diligence across the supply chain.
We work across the supply chain, including:
● freight owners (retailers, manufacturers, resource companies)
● 3PLs and contract logistics providers
● transport operators
● small and growing operators (owner-drivers, subcontractors, fleet managers)
No. Many organisations have exposure even if they don’t own or operate trucks. If your business influences transport outcomes through contracts, booking windows, site practices, delivery requirements, or carrier selection, obligations may apply.
Engagements are led by Urszula Kelly (Principal Advisor — Heavy Vehicle Compliance), supported by an internal specialist team to deliver across sites and business units.
No. Delivery is performed by our internal auditors and consultants under our own governance and quality processes.
We provide compliance advisory and audit services focused on practical implementation and assurance. Where legal interpretation or representation is required, we can work alongside your legal counsel to support evidence, corrective actions, and implementation.
A Health Check gives you a structured baseline and a prioritised action plan. An Audit is a formal assurance activity that includes interviews, walkthroughs, and evidence sampling to produce findings and corrective actions.
HVNL is the main framework that sets safety and compliance requirements for heavy vehicle transport and related activities.
HVNL applies across participating jurisdictions. It has not commenced in Western Australia or the Northern Territory. Vehicles from those jurisdictions still need to comply when operating in HVNL jurisdictions.
CoR is the part of HVNL that makes safety a shared responsibility across the supply chain. Parties other than the driver can have duties where they influence transport outcomes.
In plain terms: if you can influence heavy vehicle transport activities, you have a responsibility to help keep those activities safe—through the decisions you make and the controls you put in place.
It means taking steps that are reasonable in the circumstances to manage safety risks in the activities you influence or control. What’s reasonable depends on the risk and your ability to influence the outcome.
It can. Freight owners can influence outcomes through delivery windows, site practices, loading/unloading, contract terms, and carrier selection. If your practices influence transport activities, responsibilities may apply.
It means leaders are expected to actively oversee compliance—ensuring the right resources and processes are in place, and verifying that controls are working in practice.
Common areas include:
● fatigue and scheduling practices
● time pressure created by delivery requirements and KPIs
● subcontractor and contractor governance
● loading/unloading interfaces and site practices
● incident management, corrective action close-out, and record retention
● Your specific risk profile depends on your operating model and your role in the supply chain.
Evidence should show your controls exist, are understood, and are operating. This typically includes:
● policies and procedures that match actual practice
● training and competency records
● risk and corrective action registers
● subcontractor verification and monitoring records
● incident records, investigations, and verified close-out
● governance reporting and review notes
● The right evidence set depends on your role and the risks you influence.
NHVAS is an accreditation scheme for operators who want formal recognition of management systems and controls across specific modules.
For now, Modules include:
● Mass Management
● Maintenance Management
● Fatigue Management (Basic or Advanced)
The NHVAS is going through a major change which will be formally introduced as of the 1st of July 2026.
Not necessarily. Many organisations meet their obligations without NHVAS accreditation. NHVAS may be suitable where it supports access needs, customer requirements, or a structured compliance program.
Most engagements begin with a short scoping discussion and a structured information request. Depending on the service, this may include:
● operating model summary (sites, lanes, subcontractors, freight task)
● current policies and procedures
● sample records and registers (training, incidents, actions, scheduling controls, contractor checks)
● key contacts for interviews and walkthroughs
Yes. We work Australia-wide and support organisations operating across multiple jurisdictions. We account for jurisdictional context when scoping work.
Timeframes and evidence integrity matter. Organisations typically need to:
● stabilise risk and implement immediate controls
● preserve and organise records
● establish a clear chronology and evidence index
● implement corrective actions with owners, timeframes, and verification
● Where legal counsel is engaged, compliance work should align to a coordinated response approach.
Book a confidential consultation so we can confirm your role in the supply chain, your operating model, and the most efficient service option (Health Check, Audit, System Build, Retainer support, NHVAS audit, or response support).